There are two major schools of psychology – mentalism and behaviorism. Both theories are based on the same theory of mind. However, they do not agree on all the same issues. Despite their differences, both sides claim that their approaches are sound. Here, we’ll discuss the main difference between them and how they can be useful for you. You can also find out what a difference between a behaviorist and a mentalist is.
WATCH THIS AND THANK ME LATER
Behavioral analysis has been around for many years, but it is not widely accepted. The first school, known as functionalism, focuses on objective data. It is the result of the evolution of neuroscience and psychology. The second school, called mentalism, emphasizes subjectivity over objectivity. It is important to note that the two are not the same. For instance, behavioral analysis is based on measurable data, whereas psychiatry focuses on subjectivity.
The second school, known as behaviorism, is the most controversial. This school teaches that human cognition is simply a matter of conditioning the brain’s synapses. A stimulus causes a variety of brain synapses to fire, and the brain is taught to follow a specific synapse pathway. It ignores consciousness and emotions, but it demonstrates that the brain is still alive.
Moore’s 2003 indictment of mentalism relies on a criterion that lumps neural and nonbehavioral dimensions into one category. The problem with this criterion is that it’s too vague for any effective attack on a belief in the existence of mental entities. In fact, radical behaviorists take an ambivalent position on public observability, promoting overt behavior as the subject of scientific psychology and dismissing the notion of mental entities as unobservable.
In contrast, a behaviorist believes that human cognition is based on conditioning of brain synapses. This method eliminates the need for understanding consciousness and ignores emotions. Furthermore, it aims to eliminate the mystique attached to human actions. This is why a behavioralist is a better choice than a mentalismist. This approach is more realistic and practical for everyday life. It is based on measurable data and is able to study the mind in more detail.
In a behaviorist view, a person’s thoughts and feelings are largely a function of his environment. Thus, a behaviorist believes that he can manipulate a behavior by manipulating a person’s environment and training them to respond to certain types of stimuli. The implication of this is that he can control behavior by changing his environment. As a result, a behaviorist may adopt a different approach than a traditional psychologist, as long as he believes that it can understand the motivation behind it.
The behavioral and mental sciences should be viewed as symbiotic. Neither focuses on the other’s methodology, as the two disciplines should be a symbiotic partnership. In addition, their methods of studying human cognition and behavior should be complementary. They are not mutually exclusive. They should be complementary to one another, but they shouldn’t be interpreted as opposing viewpoints.